|
@@ -12,6 +12,12 @@
|
|
|
%% ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
|
|
|
%% OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+%% Note that Cowboy does not implement the PRIORITY mechanism.
|
|
|
+%% Everyone has been moving away from it and it is widely seen
|
|
|
+%% as a failure. Setting priorities has been counter productive
|
|
|
+%% with regards to performance. Clients have been moving away
|
|
|
+%% from the mechanism.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
-module(rfc7540_SUITE).
|
|
|
-compile(export_all).
|
|
|
-compile(nowarn_export_all).
|
|
@@ -483,14 +489,6 @@ http_upgrade_client_preface_settings_ack_timeout(Config) ->
|
|
|
%% important, an OPTIONS request can be used to perform the upgrade to
|
|
|
%% HTTP/2, at the cost of an additional round trip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-%% @todo If we ever handle priority, we need to check that the initial
|
|
|
-%% HTTP/1.1 request has default priority. The relevant RFC quote is:
|
|
|
-%%
|
|
|
-%% 3.2
|
|
|
-%% The HTTP/1.1 request that is sent prior to upgrade is assigned a
|
|
|
-%% stream identifier of 1 (see Section 5.1.1) with default priority
|
|
|
-%% values (Section 5.3.5).
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
http_upgrade_response(Config) ->
|
|
|
doc("A response must be sent to the initial HTTP/1.1 request "
|
|
|
"after switching to HTTP/2. The response must use "
|